Follow Us
How Does Economic Development Policy Affect Site Selection?
How does the Economic Development Policy Affect Site Selection?
A Century of Economic Development Leadership
For more than 100 years, the International Economic Development Council (IEDC) has been the backbone of the economic development profession—shaping how communities compete, grow, and adapt in an ever-changing economy. As the world’s largest association representing economic development organizations and practitioners, IEDC has grown from a professional convener into the most important collective voice for economic development in Washington, D.C.
I’ve been proud to be a member of IEDC since 1997, serving on multiple committees over the years and participating in gatherings like the one held this past March, Leadership Summit in Washington, D.C. Throughout that time, what has remained constant is IEDC’s commitment to elevating the profession and ensuring that local realities are reflected in federal policy—not just policy theory.
That role matters now more than ever.
IEDC actively engages Congress, the Administration, and federal agencies to advocate for the tools communities and businesses rely on every day—combining policy leadership with practitioner-focused education so economic developers can translate federal resources into real, local outcomes. From disaster recovery to workforce alignment, IEDC ensures federal investments actually work on the ground.
2026 Federal Economic Development Policy Priorities
The organization’s 2026 Federal Policy Priorities reinforce why this advocacy is so critical for communities of all sizes:
- Strengthening the U.S. Economic Development Administration (EDA) with sustained funding, expanded capacity, and faster disaster recovery tools
- Modernizing and fully funding CDBG to support infrastructure, business investment, and community resilience
- Reauthorizing the Farm Bill and investing in a new Rural Partnership Program to help rural communities lead innovative, locally driven economic strategies
- Streamlining regulatory and permitting processes to accelerate energy, manufacturing, infrastructure, and technology projects
- Supporting small business, entrepreneurship, and manufacturing tools that fuel growth and job creation
- Advancing workforce development through WIOA reauthorization, aligning talent systems with real business needs
- Investing in surface transportation to connect workers, freight, and regions to opportunity
These priorities aren’t abstract policy goals. They directly impact site readiness, workforce availability, infrastructure timing, and the competitiveness of local incentives—the very factors communities and businesses weigh when making major investment decisions.
IEDC’s work ensures that economic development policy remains practical, place-based, and forward-looking—and that the professionals doing the work have a seat at the table when national decisions are made.
After nearly three decades of membership, I remain convinced: a stronger IEDC means stronger communities, more competitive businesses, and better outcomes where federal policy meets local execution.
If you’re working in—or alongside—economic development, paying attention to IEDC’s federal priorities isn’t optional. It’s essential.
Turning Economic Development Policy into Performance
Why Policy Direction Must Inform Site Selection Strategy
IEDC’s federal priorities make one thing unmistakably clear: national policy decisions are increasingly shaping which communities are ready to compete—and which projects succeed financially over the long term. Funding for infrastructure, workforce development, regulatory reform, transportation, and economic development tools directly affects site readiness, incentive capacity, and the stability of operating environments.
For companies evaluating expansion, relocation, or new investment, these economic development policy shifts are not theoretical. They influence:
- Where talent pipelines are strongest
- Which locations can deliver infrastructure on your timeline
- How incentives are structured, funded, and sustained
- Whether projected returns hold up over the life of the project
Site Selection Can No Longer Be a Last-Stage Decision
This is why site selection and incentives can no longer be treated as transactional decisions or last-stage negotiations. They require a deliberate, informed strategy—one that accounts for policy direction, local execution, and how incentives will perform not just today, but years from now.
As a site selection and business incentives advisor, I help leadership teams translate economic development policy realities into financially sound location decisions. From evaluating markets shaped by evolving federal and state priorities to negotiating durable, performance-based incentive packages, my focus is simple: helping projects meet—or exceed—their financial goals for both the investment phase and ongoing operations.
If you are planning a project, or reassessing where and how to grow, now is the time to ensure your strategy reflects the economic development policy environment you’ll be operating in—not the one that’s already passed.
Let’s have a confidential conversation about how to align site selection, incentives, and long-term value in today’s shifting landscape.
Sources
Ashmore Consulting is proud to join Pledge 1%, a global movement creating new normal where companies of all sizes integrate giving back into their culture and values. Pledge 1% empowers companies to donate 1% of product, 1% of equity, 1% of profit or 1% of employee time to causes of their choice. Over 1,500 companies in 40 countries have taken the Pledge and committed to give to communities around the world. Ashmore Consulting is excited to join Pledge 1%’s network of founders, entrepreneurs and companies around the globe that have committed to giving back.
